Assignment – You Decide Who To Give
“You Decide” (Loans and Donation Assignment) – 4/10/-2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Since October 2004, 169,000 scholarships have been distributed to girls and boys who are economically disadvantaged, disabled, orphaned, and/or affected or infected by HIV/AIDS.” – http://agsp.worlded.org/
With a growing world population and limited national resources, as well as conflict and many other crises happening around the world, and, it is not an unexpected consequence than only some of those in need will benefit from foreign aid programs. However, choosing sometimes between who eats, or who goes to school is a very difficult problem. We have here a number of potential aid beneficiaries. By clicking on their image you will be able to visit their profile. Taking into account what you consider most important, which three individuals will you fund? There is no right answer, just difficult choices.
[Text Box]
Criteria Use to Make a Decision
Considerations |
What is the Weight (out of 1.0) |
Economically disadvantaged |
? |
The Connoisseur, The Critic, The Ethnographer and the Evaluator
Qualitative Research and Subjectivity:
The Connoisseur, The Critic, The Ethnographer and the Evaluator
April 10, 2012
Second Discussion of Qualitative Approaches (April 10)
Reading for the Week:
Eisner, E. W. (1994). The forms and functions of educational connoisseurship and educational criticism. In The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.) (pp. 212-249). New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1991). Taking a second look: Educational connoisseurship revisited.
In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Ninetieth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Evaluation and education: At quarter century (pp. 169-187). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Hemwall, M. K. (1991). Ethnography as evaluation: Hearing-impaired students in the mainstream. In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Ethnography in educational evaluation (pp. 133-152). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Pitman, M. A., & Dobbert, M. L. (1986). The use of explicit anthropological theory in educational evaluation: A case study.
Online Focus Groups: Ning “How-To” – A Primarily Asynchronous Environment
Online Focus Groups: Ning “How-To”
A Primarily Asynchronous Environment
March 29, 2012
Research Team: Mary Anne Casey, Sally Dinsmore, David Ernst, Jim Hatten, Richard Krueger, Michael Lee, Caryn Lindsay, Alison Link, Nance Longley, Mary Catherine O’Brien, Patrick O’Leary, Alfonso Sintjago
Overview
Ning is a versatile online platform used by educators, businesses, entertainment industries and other companies to hosting online communities and groups for synchronous and asynchronous communications. Ning’s most popular features are its forum tool, inbox, photos, member profiles, blog, and videos. However, many of these bells and whistles are not essential and can be distracting when setting up an effective Ning focus group environment. Through this guide we share how we decided, after a few iterations, how best to set up the layout of our Ning site and how you would be able to reproduce this organizational structure.
Ning provides an interface that is powerful and attractive. Striking an appropriate balance between features and a user-friendly design can diminish user response problems as they will able to navigate the site and respond to the questions without unnecessary complications.…
Online Focus Groups – Lessons Learned
Environment Make it Welcoming – Take some time to think through the way the interface of your online environment (site) looks. Is it inviting? Is it user-friendly? Make sure you only have on the site what is necessary for conducting the focus group. Extra things make it confusing.
Personalize it – Allow your participants to make their presence personal. Even in an anonymous group you can have people pick fun avatars. Make an intro video. Encourage participants to make one as well, if appropriate. There are several simple video tools available such as, http://intervue.me
Layout and Design – Keep the layout of the site clean and simple. Don’t make it difficult to find things (good instructional design) or too cluttered (good graphic design) |
Lessons Learned Research Team: Mary Anne Casey, Sally Dinsmore, David Ernst, Jim Hatten, Richard Krueger, Michael Lee, Caryn Lindsay, Alison Link, Nance Longley, Mary Catherine O’Brien, Patrick O’Leary, Alfonso Sintjago
|
Technology Keep the tools simple – Make sure you only have on the site what is necessary for conducting the focus group. |
Online Teaching Questionnaire – SSW – March, 19, 2012
Online Teaching Questionnaire – SSW – March, 19, 2012
This questionnaire is intended to gather information about the development and implementation of your online lesson during week 9 of spring semester. Please answer all the questions as accurately as possible. Thank you.
- Describe what you asked students to do for week nine’s online lesson.
- What were the learning outcomes that you intended students to achieve as the result of your online lesson?
- What technologies did you use to help accomplish your learning objectives?
- To what extent were the objectives met?
- In your estimation, how did the students respond to the assignment?
- Did you award course credit for completing the online assignment?
- What things do you think you were able to do online that you wouldn’t be able to duplicate in the classroom?
- Did you feel restricted in your teaching style by having to put your lesson online?
- Did you feel technologically capable of developing the online lesson?
Center for Innovative Applied Action Research in International Development
Center for Innovative Applied Action Research in International Development
March 11, 2012
By engaging graduate students in applied action research the Center hopes to bring about comprehensive changes to problems faced by communities throughout the developing world, such as the millennium development goals (United Nations, 2010). Students, scholars and community members will cooperate to explore international problems, identify best practices and discuss the potential for improving local conditions. Using innovative technologies with a high diffusion rate and extensive potential for community empowerment, such as the internet and smart mobile devices, the Center hopes to obtain a higher rate of success than that of previous initiatives in the field.
Strengthening the linkages between university students in the United States and communities in developing countries will help to make the invisible tangible and enrich the lives of the individuals involved. Modern information and communication technologies (ICT) and other recent developments in science, technology and engineering have interconnected the world into a modern day “Pangea”.
Innovation Lab – Refining the Project
Innovation Lab – Refining the Project (Spring 2012)
Alfonso Sintjago & Tryggvi Thayer
Promoting student leadership and entrepreneurial skills as well as increased student collaboration and maximizing the use of innovative technology.
The development of innovative ideas is often the result of an individual’s or a group’s attempt to solve a problem by improving on the current modus operandi. While individuals often consider ways in which to bring improvements, sometimes these tasks are often challenging and daunting. An single person may not be sure of how to address all of the required steps, be confident in their idea, or may lack all of the skills needed to materialize and finalize their idea. By encouraging students to share with other students their ideas, abstract concepts can be refined, prototyped, tested, and implemented. Rather than solving problems individually, the lab will encourage students to organically organize into teams and further develop their projects intertwining the interests, ideas, skills, and objectives of students.
Maxwell Table – Doctoral Seminar
What Do I Need To Know? |
Why Do I Need To Know This? |
What Kind of Data Will Answer The Questions? |
Where Can I Find The Data? |
Whom Do I Contact For Access? |
Time Lines For Acquisition? |
Validity Threats |
Demographics of CTC Participants |
Finding out who uses the CTCs |
Quantitative – Extent of use and population impact. Finding out the gender, age, and socio-economic status of participants. |
Survey, data collected by Ed Ministry |
Office of the First Lady, main administrator of each CTC |
Summer 2012 Various Months – 2013 |
A mixed-methods study that emphasizes the qualitative aspects of it (Big Qualitative and Small Quantitative) this study will emphasize triangulation as well as conduct interviews and observations until a saturation point is reached. Being of Dominican descent I should have a level of access and an understanding of the culture that is better than many foreign observers, yet I was not born in the DR so there may be some cultural misunderstandings. |
Focus Groups Online – Top 3 Suggestions!
Focus Groups Online – Top 3 Suggestions!
Feb 29, 2012
•Have a Clear Purpose for the Focus Group
•Take into Account the Long Time Required for Set Up
•Keep the Interface Simple and User-Friendly
•Have a Site that is Attractive and Inviting
•Use Tested and Positively Reviewed Technology
•Consider the Audience When Choosing the Technology
•Add a Tech Support Member to Your Staff
•A Co-Moderator Is Essential
•Pilot the Site (And Scenarios) When Possible
•Send Good Invitations (Good Recruiting Strategies)
•Add a Tech Day or a Test Tech Assignment
•Set Moderating Parameters (24/7, Live, Etc)
•Address Silence (Ensure Discussion Continues)
•Set Clear Rules for Participants
•Craft Engaging Questions
•Find the Right Incentives for Your Audience
•Avoid the Cognitive Overload of Participants
•Use Small Groups and Account for Attrition
Student Survey of Online Lesson February 6-11, 2012
Student Survey of Online Lesson February 6-11, 2012
You are completing your first week of online classes in spring semester. You will have one additional week of online classes March 19-24, the week following spring semester break. We would like to know how you experienced your online classes this past week. Please complete this short survey as quickly as you are able. It should take no longer than 5-10 minutes. The information is anonymous. Thanks for taking time to do this.
…